View Agenda for this meeting
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SUMMARY
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at or about
Present: Members David Baratta, Victor Cassis, Andy Gutman, Brian Larson, Michael Meyer, Mark Pehrson Absent: Members David Greco (excused), Michael Lynch (excused), Leland Prince (excused) Also Present: Barbara McBeth, Deputy Director of Community Development; Kristen Kapelanski, Planner; Mark Spencer, Planner; Lindon Ivezaj, City Engineer; David Beschke, City Landscape Architect; Rod Arroyo, City Traffic Consultant; Tom Schultz, City Attorney
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion to approve the
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.
CVS PHARMACY CHILLER EQUIPMENT, SCREEN WALL AND PARKING LOT, SP10-09
Public Hearing of the request of
In the matter of
In the matter of
a)
a) Planning Commission finding under Section 2516.2.c for the
b)
Obtaining a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the following:
Location of accessory equipment in the side yard; Permit roof top equipment
that exceeds five feet;
and
Permit roof top equipment without screening.
c)
The applicant providing a Noise Analysis demonstrating acceptable noise
levels at Final Site Plan submittal;
d)
Compliance with the amended Consent
Judgment between the City of Novi and
e)
Compliance with all conditions and requirements listed in the staff and
consultant review letters.
Motion carried 5-1.
2.
ZONING
Public Hearing of the request of Novi Mile, LLC, for Planning Commission’s
recommendation to City Council for rezoning of property in Section 16, east
of Beck Road, between I-96 and Grand River Avenue, from OST, Planned Office
Service Technology, to FS, Freeway Service District with a Planned Rezoning
Overlay (PRO).
The subject property is approximately 1.81 acres.
In the matter of USA 2 Go, SP10-11 with Zoning Map Amendment 18.694, motion
to recommend approval to the City Council to rezone the subject property
from OST (Planned Office Service Technology) to FS (Freeway Service) with a
Planned Rezoning Overlay with the following ordinance deviations: (a)
Ordinance deviations for the parking setback in the front yard (twenty feet
required, ten feet provided), exterior side yard (twenty feet required, five
feet provided) and the interior side yard (ten feet required, five feet
provided); (b) Ordinance deviation for the lack of required setback for the
proposed dumpster (ten feet required, five feet provided); (c) Ordinance
deviations for the following landscaping requirements: three foot tall berm
along the Beck Road frontage with recommended additional plantings in the
right-of-way, three foot tall berm along the I-96 frontage with recommended
additional plantings in the right-of-way, three foot tall berm along the
access road frontage with a partial berm and partial three foot tall wall
with the recommended continuation of this wall along the entire frontage,
interior parking lot landscaping deficiency of 333 square feet (2,687 square
feet required, 2,356 square feet provided), lack of building foundation
planting on the south side of the building and foundation planting area
deficiency of 1,482 square feet (2,768 square feet required, 1,286 square
feet provided); (d) Ordinance deviation for striped end island (near the
northwest corner of the site); (e) Two same-side driveway spacing waivers
for the proposed access drives on the new service road (125 feet required,
90 feet and 61 feet provided); And subject to the following PRO Conditions:
(f) Applicant shall construct the frontage road for the currently proposed
development as shown on the PRO plan to public road standards; (g) Applicant
shall provide as part of the PRO Agreement a sixty foot right-of-way for the
public collector road from Beck Road to Grand River Avenue as shown on the
PRO concept plan; (h) Applicant shall construct the remainder of the public
collector road to public road standards at the time the development of any
adjacent properties, whether by current owners or their successors and
assigns or adjacent owners; (i) Upon construction of the public collector
road linking Beck Road and Grand River Avenue with the next development
after the gas station development, left turns out onto Beck Road will be
prohibited; provided, however, that at the time of any development approval
or site plan approval, applicant or its successors and assigns can seek to
address left turn issues as part of the development/site plan approval; (j)
Applicant shall provide an access easement to the City sanitary sewer force
main and MDOT pond in the location shown on the PRO plan; (k) Applicant
shall initiate/recommence discussions with MDOT and the City to improve the
storm water detention area between the gas station site and the I-96
freeway.
The basin, owned by MDOT, may provide storm water retention benefits beyond
the gas station site as a benefit to other parcels in the area; (l)
Applicant shall specify and propose future Beck Road access improvements (to
be elaborated by the applicant); (m) The following revisions to the PRO
concept plan: Applicant shall provide additional loading zone screening
along the northern, southern and eastern property lines; Applicant shall
provide air dispensing facilities; Applicant shall shift the southerly
connection of the proposed road as indicated in the Traffic Review Letter;
Application shall redesign the gas station canopy to be in conformance with
the façade chart; Applicant shall provide additional vegetation along the
easterly property line to screen the loading zone;
(n) Applicant shall comply with all of the conditions and items noted in the
staff and consultant review
letters; and (o) Applicant will continue to work with the staff on the
proposed signage;
for the following reasons: Approval of the application accomplishes, among
other things, and as determined in the discretion of the City Council, the
integration of the proposed land development project with the
characteristics of the project area, and results in an enhancement of the
project area as compared to the existing zoning, and such enhancement would
be unlikely to be achieved or would not be assured in the absence of the use
of a Planned Rezoning Overlay; and Sufficient conditions are included on and
in the PRO plan and PRO Agreement on the basis of which the City Council
concludes, in its discretion, that, as compared to the existing zoning and
considering the site specific land use proposed by the applicant, it would
be in the public interest to grant the rezoning with Planned Rezoning
Overlay; as the benefits which would reasonably be expected to accrue from
the proposal are balanced against, and have been found to clearly outweigh
the reasonably foreseeable detriments thereof, taking into consideration
reasonably accepted planning, engineering, environmental and other
principles.
Motion carried 6-0.
MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
1.
APPROVAL OF THE
A motion to approve the
2.
APPROVAL OF THE
A motion to approve the
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at WED 03/24/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 PM FRI 04/02/10 CITY OFFICES CLOSED MON 04/05/10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM TUE 04/13/10 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING 7:00 PM WED 04/14/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 PM MON 04/19/10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM WED 04/28/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 7:00 PM MON 05/03/10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING * Actual Language of motions subject to review.
|